<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The micro-blogging stream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shannonturlington.com/2009/01/29/the-micro-blogging-stream/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shannonturlington.com/2009/01/29/the-micro-blogging-stream/</link>
	<description>I write to get it out of my head.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 19:19:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A wiki&#8217;s power comes from participation &#171; Shannon Turlington</title>
		<link>http://shannonturlington.com/2009/01/29/the-micro-blogging-stream/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A wiki&#8217;s power comes from participation &#171; Shannon Turlington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shannonturlington.com/?p=431#comment-592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We are using a wiki for our Open Source development projects, but I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re quite there on the collaboration aspect. Like all social media, a wiki becomes more worthwhile when more people participate meaningfully in it. But it is very difficult to communicate the value to someone who hasn&#8217;t participated in order to convince them to contribute. First, you have to do, and over time, you probably will come to know the value. This is similar to the value of micro-blogging, as I pointed out in an earlier post. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We are using a wiki for our Open Source development projects, but I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re quite there on the collaboration aspect. Like all social media, a wiki becomes more worthwhile when more people participate meaningfully in it. But it is very difficult to communicate the value to someone who hasn&#8217;t participated in order to convince them to contribute. First, you have to do, and over time, you probably will come to know the value. This is similar to the value of micro-blogging, as I pointed out in an earlier post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

