Monthly Archives: October 2009

A wise old Native American once said: Only the government would believe you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom and have a longer blanket. Good-bye, 5:00 p.m. daylight. I’m going to … Continue reading

  If you lick the Halloween pumpkin, extra-good Christmas presents will follow. What, you don’t do this at your house?  

Google introduces social search

It seems like something cool comes out of Google (our new overlords, all hail teh Google) every day. This time, it’s a concept called “social search.”

Social search is a big step forward in personalizing search, and thus making it much more relevant to the searcher. With social search enabled, when you search Google, along with the top results, you will see any relevant information from your social network’s public web postings. For instance, I search for “New York City.” Following the New York Google Maps, official homepages, Wikipedia entry on NYC, etc., I might also see my husband’s review of a hotel he recently stayed at in the city or my friend’s New York photos on Picasa or my colleague’s post about a professional conference there. Which is all stuff I’m very likely to be interested in, because it’s coming from people I actually know.

How does Google know? It all goes back to your Google Profile — and you should go set one up immediately, if you haven’t already. Tell Google what your public blogs, Flickr page, YouTube channel, et al are, and Google will mine those sources for search results for your social network. Tell Google what your Twitter and FriendFeed names are, and it will add your followers to your social network for searching, along with your contacts in your Friends, Family and Coworkers groups and the blogs you subscribe to on Google Reader.

Read more about Social Search from Google’s official blog. Join the Google Social Search experiment. Once you join, you can see the Social results by:

  1. clicking “Show options…” next to Web at the top of the Google Search Results, and
  2. clicking “Social” in the left nav bar under “All Results”.

You can then burrow down to individual people. Google will show their matches, as well as how you’re connected to them.

Social search is currently in the experimental phase on Google Labs, but it is a really exciting development, with a lot of potential to make Googling even more relevant, personal and timely. And of course, it is yet one more step in Google’s inevitable takeover of the world and future status as the employer/benefactor of all humans. You’ve got to admit, though, it’s still very cool.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

New features/look for Google Reader, StumbleUpon, Facebook

The thing about people who write software is: They’ve always gotta fiddle with it. I used to manage a software development team, so I know what I’m talking about. Those guys aren’t happy unless they’re fiddling. You just got to hope that the fiddling turns out to be an actual improvement. It’s a crapshoot.

Now when millions of people use your software and you’ve still gotta fiddle, well, you’re going to upset some (or many) of your users. I’ve noticed that three websites I use frequently have been mightily fiddled with recently.

First up is Google Reader. First, they introduced a “like” button (a la Facebook) on articles and some additional sharing features, including making it easier to follow people’s shared items. Now they’ve added a Popular Items section, moved the Recommendations for new blogs to the left sidebar (called Recommended Sources) and added a new sort for articles: Sort by Magic.

I actually like most of the changes here. The Google Reader interface still works pretty much as it always has, with just a few new geegaws, so it hasn’t slowed down my browsing any. I magically found some cool people to follow, and the Popular Items section is a great way to kill a dull Sunday afternoon looking at cute pics, fails and funny cartoons without actually having to subscribe to any of those bourgeois feeds. I turned on “sort by magic,” and to tell the truth, I don’t notice any difference in the sort order, but I love the name. My grade: A.

Facebook’s changes aren’t nearly so intuitive. They’ve instituted two feeds, a Live Feed, which shows all your friends’ status updates, and a News Feed, which is supposedly the most interesting items from the past day. I find them both equally murky, and now I’m always vaguely suspicious that I’m missing something.

I was pretty much over Facebook, anyway. My friend calls it a “very clever Rolodex,” and that’s how I’ve started to treat it, only visiting when I get a message or need to look someone up. For day-to-day status updates, I get much more value out of Twitter. My grade on the Facebook changes: C-.

Quick tip: You can restore Facebook to (more or less) its old look. On your Home page, in the top left corner, drag Status Updates to the top of the nav bar and then click on it (you may have to click on the tiny “More” to show the Status Updates option).

Finally, I’ve been using StumbleUpon for a very long time as an archive of links I’ve liked, and I think I have 1,400+ links stored there. I also use Delicious for active research and projects, but StumbleUpon is more of an archive of old links for me. And the redesign has me baffled. I can never tell what interface is going to appear when I click “Stumble It.” I don’t know whether I’ll get the option to assign categories or write a review or if the stumble will even work. It’s all way too confusing and basically makes me want to abandon the site altogether. My grade: F.

If there’s one thing we can count on, it’s that everything will change, whether we like it or not. And if there’s a software developer involved, the changes will be frequent, random and usually come without warning. We might as well get used to it.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Update: For the reading comprehension-impaired, I am not giving out any more Google Wave invitations, and I am closing comments on this post so people will stop asking me for them. I got a lot of very nice comments on … Continue reading

Update: The contest is closed. I have sent the invitations to the four winners. Thanks, everyone, for commenting! Yesterday I got invited to preview Google Wave. I was kind of surprised, because I don’t think I signed up for the … Continue reading

What will the Earth be like in 2050 if we do nothing about climate change?

 

Today is Blog Action Day. The subject this year is climate change. This is my contribution.

My son was born in 2008. In 2050 he will be 42 years old, still young and healthy, perhaps with children of his own.

In 2050, if carbon emissions continue to grow at today’s rate, the Earth’s temperature will rise an average of 2 degrees Centigrade by the year 2050. By 2050, outputs of corn, rice and wheat could be severely curtailed. Rising sea levels, water shortages and famine could create up to 1 billion homeless refugees. Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, droughts and floods, will increase, while we will lose many species of plants and animals forever. Disease, particularly insect-borne diseases, will spread to more areas. The effects of global warming will be most felt in developing areas, destabilizing these regions and leading to more conflict. This is the world I’m leaving to my 18-month-old son and his children. This is the world you are leaving too.

But if we halve our carbon emissions by 2050 compared to 1990, global warming can be contained within the all-important 2-degree increase. Scientists predict that keeping the temperature rise under 2 degrees will contain global warming and mitigate its worst consequences.

Scientific evidence (data you’d study in an online school science course) tells us that climate change is real and happening, and it is largely due to human causes. I believe it is the greatest crisis that has ever faced our species. Sometimes, when I think about what is happening to our planet, I feel a profound sense of hopelessness. To effectively address global warming and to curb the effects, we will have to come together in a way that humanity has never been able to before. But more often, I feel a sense of optimism. I know that one of our greatest strengths is that when we put our minds and will to something, we will accomplish it.

At the Nature Conservancy’s Planet Change site, learn more and then spread the word.

My grandmother, Helen Turlington, passed away this week. She had a lifelong love of learning and reading, which I have inherited. She held two graduate degrees. She introduced me to Chinese food. One of my best memories is of a … Continue reading

Google is still taking over the world…

My husband recently opted to get the Android phone over the iPhone. He loves it, especially how it integrates with all his other Google stuff. Now he can email me, chat with me on Google Talk, snoop on my Google calendar, all from his phone. He hasn’t looked at me since he got it. He sends me tweets from the same couch I’m sitting on. I think he wants to marry his phone.

The point is, Google keeps doing neat-o stuff and releasing it for little dollars, and that means that Google is slowly taking over the world. We’ll wake up one morning and find that Google has awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to itself. And we won’t care, as long as Gmail is up.

I personally use iGoogle as my home page, Gmail for email, Google Talk for chat, Google Calendar to manage my schedule, Google Reader for reading websites, Chrome for web browsing and Google Docs for all my documents. I have set up my Google Profile so people can find my online stuff easier. Google even helps me track the swine flu. Once the Chrome OS comes out, I will strongly consider ditching Windows. Google Wave does not seem like it will be the game changer everyone thought it would be, but it’s probably a nifty little program that I would definitely use if I actually collaborated with anyone. All in all, Google owns my ass.

And I don’t care. Should I? I’m not sure. Google messes up occasionally, as they did with the iGoogle redesign last year, and as far as I can tell, they do not believe in customer support, at least not for their non-paying customers. But all of their software does a good job, it’s free, it’s easy and it plays well together. By the time we figure out the downside, it will probably be much too late…

P.S. LifeHacker offers up seven easy ways to integrate your Googled world and free tools to back up your Googled data.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

I was idly looking through the search terms that got people over to this blog when I found the perfect blog name: Shannon’s Blog of Knowledge. Too bad that other Shannon got to it first, but I will not rip … Continue reading