Category Archives: Geeking Out

The techy side of me.

Just discovered Quora…

I just discovered Quora. I know, all the cool kids are already doing it. I am so not cool, I might as well have never left school. If you don’t know, Quora is a crowd-sourced Q&A site. I’ve been browsing around it for a few days — it’s a real time suck, to be honest — and many of the answers posted seem genuinely knowledgeable and helpful. It’s kind of an anti-Yahoo! Answers (although not nearly as funny). I usually type my questions directly into Google, so as an experiment, I’m going to type all my questions into Quora for a few weeks and see what comes up.

Your brain on computers…

The New York Times reports today that your brain needs downtime from all the digital devices that permeate our lives: television, smart phones, laptops, iPads, e-readers, video games, ad infinitum. Apparently, the “downtime lets the brain go over experiences it’s had, solidify them and turn them into permanent long-term memories.”

I don’t have scientific evidence to back this up, but in my gut I know it’s true. I have recently initiated a new habit when I spend 1-2 hours every afternoon doing yoga, cooking and/or reading physical books. I’ve found that this time away from screens helps me feel less stressed at the end of the day. I’ve also banned electronic devices from the bedroom because I think the screens may make insomnia even worse. I know I usually sleep worse when I work on my laptop late at night.

Whenever I go on vacation, I refrain from taking my laptop or other electronic devices with me. A week or a long weekend spent in exile from electronic devices is a real vacation, in my opinion.

Of course, not everyone may be able to handle the immersion in their own thoughts for any period of time, as this commenter on the NYT article points out:

This is exactly backward. The gadgets don’t interfere with mental functions. People who find mental work hard fill their time with external stimuli.

Portable radios and TVs, iPods and their imitators, cellphones, audio books, smartphones, and now tablet computers are bread and circuses, filling the voids in minds that can’t deal with complex abstractions or data that might undermine carefully constructed worlds.

[via Your Brain on Computers - Digital Devices Deprive Brain of Needed Downtime - NYTimes.com.]

I am, therefore I am…

Tweeto ergo sumMuch hand-wringing in the New York Times Sunday Magazine this morning about Twitter: I Tweet, Therefore I Am. Is Twitter taking us out of the moment? Is Twitter obliging us to always play a role for our audience of tweeps?

I think we are always playing a role regardless of whether we are tweeting or not: the role of who we’d ideally like to be. And we’re playing to an audience of one: ourselves. Really, no one else cares remotely as much about you as you do.

So if this concerns you — if you feel that because of Twitter or anything else in our oh-so-distressing modern world that you have to be “on” all the time, that you are forgetting the moment and playing a part — I do have some advice. Practice. Practice being your authentic self at all times. Practice being in the moment. It’s not so easy to do, even if you reduce your technological distractions to zero. Even Buddhist monks have a hard time with it.

Or just give in to the Twitter. This T-shirt from Neatorama might help.

I Tweet, Therefore I Am (New York Times)
I Tweet Therefore I Am…Seriously? (andrewspittle.net)
Enhanced by Zemanta

Miss your newspaper? Make one out of your Twitter feed…

I’ve said a few times before that one reason I like Twitter is because it’s like a constantly flowing river of links and informational tidbits. Unlike with RSS, I don’t feel obligated to read every single thing that appears on Twitter. Instead, I just dip my toe into the stream whenever I have some free moments.

But what about when you don’t get a chance to check in with Twitter? Isn’t it possible you might miss something?

That’s where the nifty tool paper.li comes in. It creates a daily newspaper-like web page from the links tweeted by the people you follow. (Here’s mine.) You can read it with your morning coffee, just like a real newspaper (but without all the obnoxious ink stains or ungainly page folding).

I like the way paper.li sorts the last day’s tweets into categories like Arts & Entertainment, Health and Technology. The top stories are featured on the front page, but you can click through to view all the stories in any particular category. The front page embeds all tweeted photos and videos, making them much easier to browse. One or two of the day’s popular hashtags are also featured.

You can set up a newspaper for a person’s Twitter feed or a specific hashtag or list that you want to follow. This tool makes it a lot easier to keep up with what’s going down on Twitter — but again, only when you want to.

[via W5 Blog]
Enhanced by Zemanta

How to take control of your RSS feed reader…

“And it’s like, why can’t I be a good enough person to know things about anything? Why am I so pathetic that I can’t even read, like, 100 words a day? And then I have to hit the ‘pretend everything is read’ button, which is basically like hitting the ‘lie to yourself’ button. It’s embarrassing. I hate myself when I do it. It’s like the biggest possible failure you could have in your entire life, basically.”

When I read this article in The New York Observer about obsessive RSS completists, I definitely recognized myself. Yeah, I used to subscribe to 100+ blogs and websites in Google Reader. Yeah, I used to have to get that bold number of unread posts down to 0 whenever I opened Reader. And I couldn’t just mark all as read, either. I had to skim every post — the title, at least! It felt like cheating, otherwise.

And then I had an epiphany. I was spending so much time on Reader that other things were being neglected. That was okay when I had a job, but now I have more important things to do than work. Like read real books. And take care of my child. Something had to change.

But before change can happen, there must be an ah-ha moment, when you say to yourself, as I did, “This is my tool. It does not own me. It works for me. I am the boss around here.”

The first thing I did was clean out all of my subscriptions. I unsubscribed to everything. I only kept a handful of feeds that I cherished and absolutely knew I wanted to read (almost) every post. These went into a folder labeled “Blogs I Like” and there they will remain permanently.

Next, I went on Twitter and subscribed to the Twitter feeds for the blogs I had unsubscribed from. Twitter has much different — and significantly lower — expectations than RSS. (I have written about this before.) There is no bold number of unread items. Eventually, what you haven’t read falls off the screen into oblivion. Twitter is not your ever-growing pile of homework; it is the water cooler, the fun place you drop in during work breaks.

(Eventually, I had to weed down the number of Twitter feeds I was following too, but more on that at another time.)

Gradually, I started adding blogs back to my Google Reader. It is, after all, not easy to really get to know someone on Twitter. If I want to dive in-depth into a subject or learn more about a particular writer, than I need to read their blog for a while. Only for a while. All of these new blogs go into a folder labeled “Trial.”

Here are my rules:

  • When I subscribe to a new trial blog, I mark everything as read right off the bat. After all, I don’t want to start off with a backlog and handicap myself.
  • If I log in to Google Reader and there are more than 100 unread items, I immediately mark everything in the Trial folder as “read.” No guilt, no mercy. I am just reading these sites on a trial basis, so I’m not missing anything. This is what I tell myself, and it works.
  • If at the end of the month or so, I haven’t shared or starred a post from a particular feed, then I unsubscribe. (I use Google Reader’s Trends to find this info.) So at the beginning of every month, it’s like I’m starting with a fresh slate. What a good feeling.

If I really like a “trial” blog, I may start following the Twitter feed. But if it moves from the Trial folder to the Blogs I Like folder — which currently contains only 3 subscriptions, by the way — then we know it’s love.

And in the meantime, I can get back to the book I’m reading. Right after I check Twitter.

Feed Me, I’m Hungry! New Yorkers Skim, Freak, Purge as RSS Reading Mounts (New York Observer)

Why I’m not following you on Twitter…

The Twitter fail whale error message.
Image via Wikipedia

I recently tried an experiment on Twitter. I tried following back everyone who followed me — well, almost everyone, as I’ll explain. The results were very interesting. Within a few days, I had gained more than 100 followers,  and they weren’t dropping off like they used to. I also found that my Twitter feed wasn’t overwhelming me. If anything, the tweets in my feed were even more interesting and varied than before, and there was always something new, every time I tuned in.

Even though I was following back (mostly) everyone who followed me, I didn’t want my Twitter feed to become overloaded with spam. I quickly formulated some rules to weed out those folks who were worth my time and attention from those who weren’t. The rules are really quite simple. I won’t follow you if:

  • You have no avatar. These are generally spam accounts, I’ve found. (If you have a pornographic avatar, I’m going to block you.)
  • Your Twitter name ends in several numbers. Again, this shouts “spammer!”
  • You have the words “social media expert” or “SEO” in your profile description. Or you have no profile description. I like to know a little something real about you before I’ll follow back.
  • Your Twitter username has that “make money at home” vibe or includes phrases like “DebtFree.” Ditto your tweets.
  • Your tweets are too hard sell or look like a series of spammy links.
  • The links you post all point to the same domain name.
  • You use hashtags like #acai #berry. Come on.
  • You just repeat the same tweet over and over.
  • You dominate my feed with your tweets. Or you don’t ever tweet.
  • You don’t speak my language. Nothing personal, but there’s no point in seeing tweets I can’t understand.
  • You abuse your direct message privileges. Actually, that’s a sure way to get me to block you.

I know a lot of people use Twitter for business-related reasons, such as public relations or networking. I don’t see anything wrong with this, as long as you keep in mind that Twitter is made up of people who are primarily interested in the conversation. You have to provide something of value. Share what’s going on in your community or post some interesting links that aren’t all self-serving. If it’s not a conversation — if all you’re doing is trumpeting yourself, your business or your service — then your followers will tune out. So if that’s all you intend to do, you might as well just shut up.

But if you’re interested in having a conversation with me, you’re welcome to follow me. I’m on Twitter as sturlington.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

How to protect your privacy on Facebook…

I was a latecomer to Facebook. I just joined the service a little less than a year ago. At first, it was great being able to keep up with far-flung cousins and old high school friends, with no effort whatsoever. I eagerly checked in several times a day.

But after a month or so, my Facebook usage waned. All the Farmville and quiz status updates were annoying. I started getting weird spam and friend invites from people I didn’t remember knowing. To tell you the truth, I just felt more comfortable on Twitter.

Now I hardly ever visit Facebook at all, but I still update it now and then. It really is the only way I can stay in touch online with a large group of people. Mostly I share information about my kid or photos of him from TotSpot. I never visit pages anymore, or play games, or take quizzes. I stay off Facebook as much as possible.

Given this week’s news, I’m glad I’ve limited my exposure. Facebook is now trying to integrate itself with the web at large, and it needs our data to do it. It wants us to “like” things on partner sites. Our “like” data will probably be sold to marketers, who will turn around and try to sell us more things. I don’t know about you, but I am fed up with people trying to sell me stuff all the time.

I will stay on Facebook, just because it is the most convenient way to keep in touch with some people. But I will use the site even less now. I have tried to make my settings as private as possible. Here’s what I did.

All of these settings are available under the Account tab (upper right corner). Click “Privacy Settings.”

  • I clicked on Personal Information and Posts and changed each option to Only Friends can see, except for my bio.
  • I clicked on Contact Information and made sure my phone numbers and email address were visible only to friends or only to me. I also made sure Only Friends could send me a message.
  • I clicked on Friends, Tags and Connections and set everything to Only Friends. Except for Photos and Videos of Me — I set this to Only Me so no one will see any potentially embarrassing photos of me tagged with my name.
  • I clicked on Applications and Websites and then What Your Friends Can Share About You and unchecked every box.
  • Also under Applications and Websites, I changed Activity on Applications and Games Dashboards to Only Friends.
  • Also under Applications and Websites, I unchecked the box to join the new Instant Personalization Pilot Program, which shares your “like” data with other companies.

Finally, under the Account tab, I selected “Application Settings.” In the Show menu (top right, above the applications list), I selected “Authorized.” This shows every application and website you’ve authorized to see your Facebook data. I deleted every application or website I didn’t recognize or know I don’t use.

I did not edit my employer, school or interest pages, because I considered them fairly innocuous or so broad as to be useless to marketers. But this may be a concern for some, especially people with unpopular political views or unusual hobbies. There’s a lot of good information about how to protect yourself in this post.

How to Restore Your Privacy on Facebook (Gawker)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

How to search your old Tweets + Twitter spring cleaning tips

I recently had a question: How do I search my own tweets for an old link I might need or a great quip I had made? The problem with Twitter‘s search tool is that it’s time-limited. You can search your tweets by prefacing the search keyword with your Twitter username, but the search results will only go back a week or so. This is a pretty serious limitation of Twitter’s search functionality.

It turns out there is no good tool for searching your past archive of all tweets. Google will search tweets, but it’s not at all easy to limit that search to just your own tweets.

The best solution I’ve found requires a little forethought. First, you have to archive your tweets in a searchable location. I use FriendFeed, which also archives my Delicious bookmarks, StumbleUpon finds and blog posts. Here are some other places where you can archive your tweets.

If you start the archive now, it won’t be much help in finding tweets from 6 months ago, but at least you will have a searchable archive going forward. However, if you already have a FriendFeed account or similar Twitter archive, you can use the search tool there to search through your past tweets. I use FriendFeed’s advanced search, so I can limit the search to just my feed by entering my username in the “Specific friends/groups” box.

If you just want to search links, BackTweets may help. It enables you to search links posted on Twitter, and it expands shortened links. Unfortunately, you can’t search only your own Twitter account.

A better solution is to archive your tweeted links on a searchable platform. Packrati.us fills the void. It automatically archives every link you tweet to your Delicious bookmarks. It will even tag the link with each hashtag you add to the tweet. This has been a real timesaver for me, because I like to share useful tweets on Twitter and then save them on Delicious, which used to be a two-step process.

Speaking of Twitter, now might be a good time to spring-clean your Twitter account. I just went through my followers list so I could block questionable followers and make sure I was following back the interesting people. I also cleaned up my Twitter lists. Mashable suggests some good tools to help.

The best tool on the list, I thought, was UnTweeps. This tool finds all of the people you’re following who haven’t tweeted in a while (30 days or more) and lets you quickly unfollow them. Twitter Karma also seems like a cool tool. It shows who you’re following and who’s following you back. Unfortunately, I couldn’t get it to work for me yet; it depends on how busy Twitter is when you run it.

10 Ways to Archive Your Tweets (ReadWriteWeb)
FriendFeed
BackTweets
Packrati.us
How to: Spring-clean Your Twitter Account
(Mashable)
UnTweeps
Twitter Karma
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Looking out into space keeps our dreams alive…

Pillar and Jets

Looking at these stars suddenly dwarfed my own troubles and all the gravities of terrestrial life. I thought of their unfathomable distance, and the slow inevitable drift of their movements out of the unknown past into the unknown future. —H.G. Wells

Today is the 20th anniversary of the Hubble Space Telescope’s launch into space, and I am reflecting that our exploration of space — our attempts to see it, understand it and actually go out  in it — is the most optimistic thing we do as human beings.

Each time we look to the stars and try to touch them in some way — by learning their history, by understanding them better, by actually flying out into our solar system (and one day, maybe, to another star) — we are affirming that we have a long future ahead of us. We are building the pool of knowledge that our descendants will use to explore farther and know more than we thought possible. While acknowledging that we are but a tiny part of the galaxy, we know that we are an integral part of it, that it is our home.

In its 20 years orbiting above us, Hubble has sent back amazing images of distant galaxies and of the Shoemaker-Levy comet impacting Jupiter. Hubble provided evidence of black holes at the centers of galaxies and of extrasolar planets. The Hubble deep field images show us galaxies billions of light years away and let us literally look back in time to the early universe.

Meanwhile, the Solar Dynamics Observatory has just started sending back amazing images of our own sun. The Solar Dynamics Observatory is billed as the Hubble of heliophysics, the most advanced spacecraft ever built to study the sun. Scientists will use it to better understand our sun and how it affects our own planet.

Looking ahead, President Obama has proposed a trip to an asteroid in lieu of returning to the moon. This is an exciting idea that could really inspire imaginations. In addition, the trip has many practical goals. Figuring this out and actually doing it would be an important first step in making the journey to Mars. It would also be good to know in case we detect an asteroid on a collision course with Earth that we need to divert. Finally, it would greatly advance scientific knowledge as well as possibly open a new area of natural resources. We need these kinds of visionary, imaginative goals — the stuff of science fiction — to keep us looking to the future, to keep us optimistic.

HubbleSite
Hubble Space Telescope
(Space Telescope Science Institute)
Happy 20th Anniversary, Hubble! (Discover)
Hubble Heritage Gallery of Images
Pictures: NASA Solar Observatory’s First Shots (National Geographic)
Danger, President Obama! Visiting an Asteroid Is Exciting, but Difficult (Discover)

Some Google Buzz tips: How to post privately & address your posts to particular people

I have been enjoying using Google Buzz the past few weeks (although I wish more people in my network were on Buzz). It has been a great medium for sharing links via Google Reader and then having interesting discussions, sometimes with total strangers, about the links.

But Buzz has been even more useful for quick, asynchronous chatting with friends and family. Gmail is a terrific email program, but it is not so good at threading. When you exchange more than a couple of emails with someone, particularly when the messages are very short, it quickly gets unwieldy. Here’s where Buzz fills the void. The comments feature supports quick back-and-forth conversations that are easy to follow and review later. So far, I have used Buzz to set up book club meetings, figure out where to go for a family dinner and chat with my husband all day long.

But you don’t necessarily want the world to read those chats. By default, what you post on Buzz is public and is recorded on your Google Profile page. Buzz makes it very easy to make any conversation private, but the process is not entirely intuitive. Here’s how you do it.

  1. Type your message into Google Buzz.
  2. Beneath the message you’ll see a button that says: “Public on the web.” Click it and select “Private.”
  3. You’re not done yet. Next to the button is a link that says “Select group.” Click this link.
  4. A list of your groups appears, if you have any. This list is taken from your Contacts. Check the group whose members you want to be able to read the Buzz. If the group doesn’t exist, click “Create a new group.” In the window that opens, give the group a name and select the contacts to add. For example, you may want to add a group containing just your spouse. Then click the Done button.
  5. Click the Post button.

The message will appear with a little lock symbol to indicate that it is private and visible only to the people in the groups you selected. (If you click the Private link next to the lock, you will see who can read the post.) It also won’t show up on your public Google Profile.

Now when you go to post a Buzz, your last privacy setting will be selected by default. So if you want to post a public message, such as a link, you will have to re-select the “Public on the web” option under the message area.

If you are posting a message for a specific person, it is a good idea to identify that person in the message itself. Buzz will send the message to the person’s Inbox, where they are more likely to see it. Here’s how you do it:

  1. In the Buzz message window, type the @ symbol followed by the first few letters of the person’s name.
  2. A pop-up box appears showing all matching email addresses from your Gmail contacts. Select the correct email address. The address now appears in the Buzz message.
  3. Continue typing the message and click the Post button. The post will contain the person’s name, highlighted and linked, instead of their email address. It will also go to that person’s Gmail Inbox.

You can use this same trick when commenting on a Buzz post as well.

Now the recipient of the message can read the post in their Inbox and reply to it using the comments feature. All of the replies should show up in your Inbox. Just like email, but easier to read and quicker to reply.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]