Review of 11/22/63 by Stephen King on Blogcritics

Stephen King’s latest novel, 11/22/63, is not what you might expect from the master of horror. For one thing, it’s not horror. It’s a time travel yarn, a love story, a meticulously researched piece of historical fiction, and a gripping suspense novel. But it’s definitely not horror. It is, instead, something new and different for King, and for those of us who are longtime fans, it’s a welcome change. King is still doing in this book what he has always done best: he thrusts ordinary people into extraordinary situations and then sees what happens. Which makes for a great story.

Read the rest of my review: 11/22/63 by Stephen King – Blogcritics Books.

The International Space Station is celebrating 10 years of a continuous human presence in space! This is a remarkable achievement and a great example of how nations can work together to achieve something that benefits us all. This little video describes some of the experiments that are being done on the Space Station now, leading to the technological innovations of tomorrow. Notice the emphasis on sustainability efforts.

The problem that we’re wrestling with, as a culture, is that the old ways don’t work anymore. Capitalism doesn’t work anymore, not in the old, unfettered, limitless growth way we think of it. Many jobs, many industries are going away. We need to rewrite the rules, rebuild the systems. But we seem stymied, for some reason I can’t fathom. We can’t seem to think outside the box we’ve put ourselves in. I believe in human creativity, ingenuity, innovation, but for now it seems to have fled. So we indulge in doom and gloom, in bemoaning our past and fearing our future, without realizing that now we have the opportunity to build something great. It’s in our hands. Ours alone.

In which I overshare…

In which I share a little too much about myself, in the spirit of our times: Changes (on my Simply Cooking blog).

Too much information?

At left in the foreground, a printer removes a...

Image via Wikipedia

There is no doubt about it — we are living in an information Golden Age. In just a matter of minutes, and assuming my computer and Internet connection are working, I can find the top news stories of the day, plus analysis and commentary; I can research almost any question I have; I can read opinions on pretty much any subject; I can watch videos, view art and listen to music, all with a click.

But is it all too much for us to cope with? I’m reading a fascinating book about the history of science: Coming of Age in the Milky Way by Timothy Ferris. He describes how the invention of the printing press put books that were once extremely difficult to obtain into nearly every university, library and even some homes. Just as importantly, the accuracy and consistency of those books became much more reliable because they were no longer copied out by hand. As a result, science experienced a boom time, because scientists could finally easily read, study and build on each other’s ideas and data.

The development of the Internet, I think, will carry us into another boom time, if it hasn’t already begun. Not since the invention of the printing press has it been so easy to share information and build on what we already know. I don’t think it’s possible to have too much information. Information inevitably leads to innovation and progress. (That’s why it is so often suppressed.)

Internets = srs.biz. Parody motivator.

Image via Wikipedia

However, we have to change our habits when it comes to dealing with this unending flow of information, just as readers and publishers had to in the Renaissance following the invention of the printing press. It is no longer sufficient to be a passive receiver, even if you are not a scientist, but are a mere consumer of information. And content producers can no longer be one-way broadcasters of mass media, pushing content out to the lowest common denominator.

Rather, we must cultivate our sense of discernment, our ability to analyze, our critical thinking skills. We must be more willing to challenge what we read, see and hear on the Internet. We also must actively cull our incoming information flow, constantly editing our content stream so that it best serves our needs. I didn’t learn these skills in school; I don’t think many of my generation did. But they may (and should) be taught to my son.

I have had to learn for myself how to direct the fire hose of information. I have found this challenging and exciting, especially as I have watched the rise of social networks and seen how others engage in commentary and sharing. We are all helping one another to learn. We no longer rely on experts; each one of us can be consumer, publisher, analyst and critic of information.

My son is only three years old, but already I can see that he is unwilling to act as a passive receiver of information. Television cannot hold his attention when the computer beckons. What has been a challenging learning experience for me will probably be second nature to him.

I think it’s a waste of time to wonder if there is too much information available to us today. There is clearly no such thing as “too much information.” Human beings thrive on information, and if our species can be said to have a common purpose, it has been to increase our knowledge, to explore and discover. We will figure out how to better use these tools that we’ve invented. Our ability to adapt is one of our strengths, after all. But best of all, we will progress. With all of this information at our disposal, I don’t think we’ll be able to help it.

The kitchen of the future?

While this kitchen of the future sounds cool, it might also take all the fun out of cooking. Why not just push a button and have a fully cooked turkey pop out, like on the Jetsons? Still, I like the idea of a dishwasher that grinds up your dishes and then rebuilds them as you need them.
 Welcome to the kitchen of the future

In 100 years’ time (or less), all kitchen appliances will be connected to the internet. Utensils will help you cook. Sensors will keep you safe from fire or poisons. It’s a brave, new cullinary world

Ugh, Google Reader!

I have to admit that my consumption of RSS feeds has fallen off in recent months. I used to read a lot of blogs through RSS, using Google Reader, but that became unwieldy because I have this unhealthy completist compulsion. If there was a bold number next to “All Items,” I had to get it down to 0, even if I didn’t have time to read umpty-million blog posts all saying just about the same thing.

So I unsubscribed from a lot of blogs and moved most of my reading over to Twitter. Since Google+ debuted, I’ve been progressively abandoning Twitter for posts on Plus. But I still kept a few RSS feeds that were so valuable to me that I always wanted to read them. I  usually had less than 100 new posts to read a day, so I was generally happy.

But now Google Reader has been redesigned, and I’m very unhappy indeed. When I first heard about this news, I thought it meant better integration with Google+, which could only be a good thing. But this doesn’t seem to be so. The sharing feature that sends Reader items to Google+ is unwieldy to use and the end result is none too elegant. But even worse, Google Reader is now impossible to read. There is so much white space and no clear delineation between posts, making it a chore to read anything. Considering that’s Reader’s main purpose, I’d say the redesign is a massive fail.

So does this mean the much-predicted death of RSS is finally here? Well, it may be here for me. However, RSS is still a fundamentally useful way of keeping up with new content on favorite websites. I just want a friendly way of accessing that content. How do the Kindle and iPad handle feeds?

Here’s an article that captures exactly my feelings on the changes to Google Reader: The Google Reader Redesign is an Ugly, Lonely User Experience – Forbes.

Photos from Bangkok…

Photos from the flooding in Bangkok. Climate change = more extreme weather events.

Moons and rings…

What a stunning image! Saturn is my kid’s favorite planet, and I can certainly understand why.

Found at: A panoply of moons and rings | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine.

Denial is not a river in Egypt…

Without a sense of optimism about the outcome, I suspect we couldn’t work hard to make good things happen. But this psychological failsafe is a double-edged sword, because it lets us remain comfortably in denial when there’s some really bad shit looming on the horizon.
 Your brain won’t allow you to believe the apocalypse could actually happen

You may love stories about the end of the world, but that’s probably because, deep down, you don’t believe it could ever happen. But that’s not because you’re realistic.