Tag Archives: Blogs

I recently read that the blog Shit My Kids Ruined is the latest to snag a book deal. Which got me wondering: what do blogs like CakeWrecks and Fail Blog, which completely rely on other peoples’ photos, do when they go … Continue reading

A new baby blog (not a blog about babies!)

It has been one of those weeks. You know the kind, where every day seems like Friday until that sickening moment when you realize it’s not. I had jury duty for the first time ever, which entailed sitting in a tiny basement room with lots of strangers who forgot their reading material and no coffee. Each day has taken on a surreal quality, due to lack of sleep and never-ending allergies. I am more than ready for the weekend by now.

Anyway, last weekend, I created a little blog on Posterous where I’m posting cool book covers and illustrations. I don’t know what I’ll do with it or even if I’ll update it too often. I was mostly using it to learn Posterous, which is a pretty spiffy blogging platform. I don’t think Posterous would work as well for power-blogging as WordPress does, but it would be great for a scrapbooking or research blog. The bookmarklet for posting from a web page works very well, and you can also easily submit posts by email. It’s a good tool to have in the online toolbox.

You can check out the new Posterous blog here.

Update: I realized when I reread the title of this post that it might seem I had started a blog about babies. No. I meant a teeny, tiny, immature blog.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Let’s all stop saying “after the jump”…

The phrase “after the jump” on blogs is one of my particular pet peeves, and I have noticed that usage does not seem to be abating. One reason why it’s annoying is because the majority of the readership has no idea what it means — including the blogger, in many cases. Besides being unintelligible, it’s also meaningless in many blog-reading situations. More after the paragraph break.

See how annoying that was? Anyway, “after the jump” originated as a newspaper term, referring to front-page stories that were continued inside the paper. Bloggers took up the term to refer to stories that continued after a break caused by an inline advertisement. It might also refer to a break from the truncated story on the blog’s front page to the full post.

Even though it started as a newspaper term, editors did not put the actual words “after the jump” in the paper. Instead, they said something more intelligible and helpful, such as “continued on A-23.” And since newspapers don’t change format from one reader to another, the text was helpful for all readers.

This is not true on the web. In many cases, I see “after the jump” where there is in actuality no jump of any kind. That’s because I’m either reading the full story in the RSS feed or on the interior of the blog (not the front page). In some instances, I’ve seen the phrase used several paragraphs before or even after said jump. This is just confusing. And it breaks the flow of what I’m reading, making me less inclined to finish your post, whether there’s any jump or not.

Even if there is a so-called jump, many readers are still scratching their heads. Jump? What’s that? I may have to click a link to get to the rest of the story, or I may have to scroll down a page. But I am never required to jump.

If you really must signal to your less-than-intelligent readers that they should click on a link or scroll past an ad to continue reading, why not use a phrase that everyone can parse instantly. How about: “Continue reading” or “Click for more” or “Scroll down for more”? And here’s an idea — don’t put this in the content but with the element that the Internet boneheads must successfully navigate around. That way, those of us who don’t have to perform the maneuver don’t have to be bothered with the instructions either.

“After the jump” is so overused these days that it’s becoming a tired cliche. You don’t want your writing to be tired, do you? I didn’t think so.

Rant over.

After the Jump on Ask MetaFilter
After the Jump on Urban Dictionary

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

This feminist’s dilemma, and a side of rant about mommy blogging…

{{en|Portrait shows Florence Thompson with sev...

Have we come a long way, baby? Image via Wikipedia

The most interesting reading in the New York Times Magazine this past Sunday was this little article titled “The Femivore’s Dilemma” in a direct homage to Michael Pollan‘s tome, The Omnivore’s Dilemma.

Posit: Once upon a time, women raised kids and took care of the home and were generally unsatisfied.

Posit: The feminist movement made it possible for women to go out and get jobs they can’t stand so they can work too much and never get to see their families, just like men. Now no one is taking care of the home, and everyone gets to feel equally unsatisfied.

Posit: In the modern-day “Mommy Wars,” you are either a Stay-at-Home mommy or a Working Mother. There is no middle ground. And you can absolutely not relate at all to someone who would make a different choice than you.

And that’s where we stand today.

I consider myself to be a feminist. When my son was born, I quit my job (and I have to admit that I wasn’t all broken up about that decision either) to take care of him full-time. Since I will probably only have one child, I considered this to be a once-in-a-lifetime experience, one that both my son and I will benefit from. Meanwhile I have the rest of my life to work, sigh. But I did not feel like I had to turn in my feminist card at the door, and I completely reject the label of “stay-at-home” mom (or the more insipid SAHM).

According to the NYT Magazine piece, there are plenty of other highly educated moms who have followed the same route. I do recognize something of myself in the article. For example:

A generation and many lawsuits later, some women found meaning and power through paid employment. Others merely found a new source of alienation. What to do? The wages of housewifery had not changed — an increased risk of depression, a niggling purposelessness, economic dependence on your husband — only now, bearing them was considered a “choice”: if you felt stuck, it was your own fault.

It seems that today’s feminist feels a tad guilty about just staying home with the kids. So they become 21st century homesteaders, raising chickens and stuffing sausages and brewing their own beer and whatnot. They turn into “radical homemakers,” or to use the article’s cute term, “femivores.”

All of this extra, probably unnecessary hard work lends enough cachet to the non-employed-for-money mother that she no longer has to feel ashamed of stepping out of the rat race just to take care of the kids (which is hard enough, believe me). I don’t think there’s anything wrong with taking on some of the lost domestic arts, if they provide enjoyment and a feeling of self-sufficiency. What I do take issue with is the notion of doing so to justify to other feminists the choice of dropping out of the standard career path.

Why can’t we embrace the middle ground, which is where I find that most of us live in the real world anyway? Some of us feminists don’t have any interest in breaking the glass ceiling. We get exhausted just thinking of power suits and power lunches. We’re not cut out for it. But neither are we entirely willing to tie a kerchief around our heads and go muck out the chicken coop either.

There should be room for all kinds of women and all kinds of ways to choose to live your life. And your choices don’t have to be a statement, whether for feminism or for so-called traditional values. They can just be your life. Enjoy.

P.S. Another article that caught my eye was in the style section. It was about “mommy bloggers” (another odious term), their conferences and brand-building and the general professionalization of motherhood now that we’re all on social networks. Here’s my question: Do we really have to commoditze everything? I understand that it’s nice to make a few extra bucks, but is it worth it to turn your every experience with your children into something that’s for sale? Or to chase after free swag to the detriment of your relationships? (True confession: I have one “mommy blogger” friend who I have stopped following on Twitter because I could no longer take her incessant PR-fueled tweets.) Well, if you ask me, the whole world of “mommy blogging” has become so infested by marketing shills, it’s hard to find anything authentic there anymore.

The Femivore’s Dilemma (New York Times)
Honey, Don’t Bother Mommy. I’m Too Busy Building My Brand. (New York Times)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Twitter vs. RSS: How Twitter has freed me from hours of blog reading

I used to subscribe to all my favorite blogs and read them in Google Reader. But no matter how much I tried to stay on top of them, I always ended up subscribed to 100 or more blogs, which were collectively posting hundreds of times a day. I was spending hours skimming through blog posts.

There is something about the RSS feed reader that makes a completist like me feel like I have to at least look at every post that shows up. Maybe it’s that bold number at the top. I have to get it down to 0 each time I open up Reader. It’s like my email Inbox — it must always be empty. And it feels like cheating to mark everything as read when I hadn’t actually read it.

Another problem was that I was reading about the same things 5, 6 or 10 times over in different blogs. There aren’t that many blogs that consistently post new content. Usually, they just react to the same bit of news as everyone else.

So one day, not too long ago, I unsubscribed to most of the blogs in my Reader. And I started following the bloggers on Twitter instead.

Almost everyone who blogs is also on Twitter. And they usually tweet about their own blog posts as well as other interesting bits of news and links. So everything in their RSS feeds also shows up on Twitter.

But I don’t have the same need to have to catch up with everything on Twitter that I do in my RSS feed reader. Twitter is like a river of information flowing by (I know that New York Times columnist used the same metaphor in his Twitter article but he stole it from me — he must have overheard me making this observation in a Starbucks or something). Every now and then, when I have a few minutes, I dip my toes in the river. Google Reader, on the other hand, is more like a dam, and all the new information flowing in backs up into a lake that I feel compelled to empty.

But what if I miss something? Well, so what if I do. The Internet is so vast, and there is so much interesting stuff going on all the time, that I’m bound to miss many things. Besides, the truly interesting things get reposted so much that I will see them sooner or later. By doing most of my reading through Twitter, I have found that I am more in control of how long I spend surfing. Whether I want to stop in for a few minutes or hang out for an hour, when I am done and ready to move on to other things, I just close the page and walk away.

Twitter lists are the new feature that have made this really possible for me. I obviously don’t want to follow thousands of people — too much noise. I tend to follow just the people who are consistently interesting. But I can add anyone I want to a list without having to follow them. So when I want to dip into a particular subject of interest, such as the world of book bloggers or minor celebrities, I open up my list on that topic.

I still use Google Reader, but it’s a much more targeted use now. RSS is a very handy way of keeping on top of news that really interests me, such as local events or personal friends’ FriendFeeds or Google alert results. And there are still a very few blogs where I want to see every posting. For instance, I know if it’s interesting, eventually it’s going to show up on MetaFilter, so I still subscribe to that feed. But now when I open Google Reader, the bold number that faces me is usually less than 20, which is a lot easier to zero out.

This is yet another reason why Twitter is so much greater than people generally think it is. And it’s not at all addictive. So if you’ll excuse me, I have to go find out whether Justin Bieber is still trending.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    Practical uses for blogs: Journals and research notebooks

    The blog has become so popular because it is a format that has a wide variety of uses. Generally, web surfers are used to seeing blogs used in one of the following ways:

    • to present information and news on a narrow subject in small, manageable chunks, generally supported by advertising
    • to communicate news about a service, product, organization or program
    • as a diary, detailing the daily life of the writer, which may or may not be of interest to anyone else
    • in its original usage, as a place to post interesting links (although I think other tools have surpassed the blog for this purpose)

    Or as some combination of the above.

    I have found the blog to be a useful format for another purpose: as a notebook or journal. I keep 6 blogs (5 public, 1 private), which I grant you, seems like a lot. But to my mind, they are the virtual equivalents of 6 notebooks I might have once kept or did keep before I discovered blogging. Yet they are so much more powerful.

    I think of my blogs as journals or research notebooks. Journals differ from diaries in that diaries typically focus on the mundane day-to-day events in the life of a person. A journal, on the other hand, is a record of a person’s thoughts and learnings, often about a particular subject. For instance, you might keep a journal recording your thoughts about the books you read, as I do. Or if you are teaching yourself to cook, you might keep a journal of tips, recipes, ingredient notes, etc. (again, as I do).

    A journal can also be the equivalent of a research notebook, although I differ between the two because I tend to keep more clips, quotes, pictures and other people’s writing in a research notebook, while a journal is usually all original writing. For instance, one of my blogs is my notebook of post-apocalyptic research. It contains photographs, lists, article summaries, poetry and my own thoughts, all mixed together.

    Blogs have it all over physical notebooks, though. Here’s why:

    • Links - you can link to articles of interest, research sources, related pieces, etc.
    • Media - it is relatively easy to incorporate graphics, photographs, audio and media into a blog to enrich the content.
    • Search - a blog is fully searchable, making it a simple matter to locate whatever you’re looking for.
    • Tagging - enables you to quickly categorize your work, cross-reference related items and visually see patterns emerge over time.
    • Unexpected feedback - Blogs can be public or private. But if you make your blog public, you are inviting comment, which allows others to contribute their own ideas, other resources, questions and support to your work, which may enrich your work in unanticipated ways.

    Whenever I start a new project from now on, I intend to start a blog to accompany it. Whether it amounts to anything is not important. What is important to me are the tools that blogs offer to help me plan, record, organize and — yes, this one is important, as well — share my work and what I’ve learned.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    Just to show…

    My last post was a little bit gloomy. But I am still looking ahead to the future! And just to show that, I have started a new little blog… an electronic notebook, really, of helpful, inspiring and (dare I say?) fun post-apocalyptic resources. There’s music, art, ideas, so head on over to emptyearth.wordpress.com and check it out.

    This is really a little research project I’m working on that may or may not turn into something more. But some of you crazy kids who stop by here might be interested. Who knows?

    I was idly looking through the search terms that got people over to this blog when I found the perfect blog name: Shannon’s Blog of Knowledge. Too bad that other Shannon got to it first, but I will not rip … Continue reading

    Ok, I have given the old blog a little bit of a makeover. We’ll live with it for a little while and see how we likes it. I am hoping to make this blog a little more fun and a … Continue reading

    My social media world

    This past weekend I joined Facebook, and now my social media world is so complex and intertwined that it makes my head hurt. To help me make sense of it all, I drew this map:

    My social media map

    My social media map

    (I used bubbl.us, which is a really intuitive, easy-to-use, free mind-mapping tool.)

    This doesn’t show all my social media sites, just the ones I use most regularly. But it did help me organize my social media efforts, at least in my own head. The black lines show everything that feeds into FriendFeed, which is my nexus and the most complete view of what I’m doing online. The gray lines show which services are being automagically updated by which other services, usually via an RSS feed or FriendFeed’s automatic output to Twitter.

    I organized my social media universe into four quadrants. My home quadrant (tan) — my blogs but also my Google Profile – are my home bases on the Web and also where the world finds me. My networks quadrant (green) have organized quite naturally into a professional network that I use only occasionally (LinkedIn), a network of friends and family I know in real life (Facebook) and an online network with many overlaps with the other two networks that I use most frequently and is the largest (Twitter).

    My links quadrant (purple) are my tools for collecting and sharing links. I read blog posts and other articles via RSS feed in Google Reader every day, and share interesting finds out to my network. Delicious is where I permanently store links and do research. StumbleUpon is more of a historical record of links I’ve blogged about, plus a lot of random fun stuff I discover while surfing the web.

    Finally, there are miscellaneous tools that reflect my hobbies in the pink quadrant. I’m an avid reader, so I have several tools for organizing and recording my reading and books (LibraryThing, Lists of Bests, All Consuming), which feed back to my books blog and sometimes Twitter. I also use tools to track my goals (43 Things) and travel (43 Places), and to upload my photos (Flickr).

    Of course, not everything is on here. I didn’t include really miscellaneous places like my Amazon Wishlist or Bookmooch, or places I rarely visit like Digg or Technorati. But it is nice being able to visualize my little online universe and my place within it.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]