Tag Archives: Ideas

Another way for writers to make a living…

Here’s an interesting first-person account in  The Chronicle of Higher Education from a writer who makes his living writing papers for college and university students. Not just undergraduate essays but graduate school theses and semester-long projects; he’s even completed online courses for students and participated in class discussions.

I live well on the desperation, misery, and incompetence that your educational system has created. Granted, as a writer, I could earn more; certainly there are ways to earn less. But I never struggle to find work.

This essay really brings home how much of a game it all is. Stack up the extracurriculars and pump up the SATs in high school to get into a good college. Fake your way through the coursework to win the appropriate degree. Get a job in which that degree will have absolutely no bearing but for which it is required. Work until you die.

The writer almost makes a case for becoming a freelance cheater instead. Except it sounds like so much work.

via The Shadow Scholar.

Why are stories so important?

Telling stories is as basic to human beings as eating. More so, in fact, for while food makes us live, stories are what make our lives worth living. — On Stories, Richard Kearney

To be a person is to have a story to tell. — Isak Dinesen

Once the necessities for survival are taken care of, we humans spend more of our free time immersed in story than doing anything else. Stories about things that aren’t true and people that don’t exist, for the most part. Think about it. We watch movies and television; play video games; read books, comics and cartoons; listen to songs; look at art; see performances of plays, dance and operas; and tell each other stories around the dinner table or the campfire. And we have always done this, since we learned to communicate with one another and figured out how to scratch drawings on a cave wall.

Stories are such a huge part of our lives that we must be hard-wired not only to love them, but to absolutely need them. One of the most meaningful and enjoyable aspects of my life is the time I spend with stories, primarily in novel form, reading about events and people that someone else has simply made up. And I can’t really imagine a life worth living without them.

But why are stories so important to us? I don’t think there is any one reason. It seems to me that stories are so necessary because they serve so many critical functions that enable us to survive and thrive as humans, all at once.

First of all, what is a story exactly? It’s as simple as the anecdote you tell your spouse at dinner about the jerk at work and what he did, or the lurid events relayed on the local news. There’s a reason we refer to both of these as “stories.” A story is essentially a series of events on a particular subject related by a person to an audience.

The first function of stories, I think, is to escape the humdrum, routine nature of life. Life, we hope, is long, and often quite a lot of time passes between significant events happening. During that time, we do the dishes, brush our teeth, go to work — all of which is not that interesting. A story collapses these events, leaving out the boring bits. Through story, we can pretend to be somebody else or go somewhere else, without taking on the risks or expense ourselves. We can even do the impossible, like travel through time or explore the universe. Kids play pretend from a very young age, and through various kinds of stories, we never really stop.

This escape factor makes stories highly entertaining. They pass the time. They’re fun. The fun factor enables stories to fulfill their other functions. One of the most basic functions of the story is to teach. We use stories to quickly and easily learn facts; research shows that we retain facts more readily if they are related in narrative form. But stories also teach us how to be.

Human cultures have always reinforced societal norms via storytelling. Through stories we communicate to our children (and to outsiders) how to act toward one another, what we value and what is possible. Stories preserve our own history and culture, passing it along in a form that’s easy to remember to the next generation.

We use stories not only to learn but also to speculative, to pose questions and then find solutions. What would happen if we made contact with an alien race? Stories help us explore all the possibilities. What would be the consequences of cheating on your spouse? Stories help us understand that hypothetical situation as well. When we tell stories about ourselves, we are imagining all our possible futures and, we hope, helping ourselves choose the best ones.

Beyond just speculation about what might happen, we use stories to answer the great unanswerable questions. Why am I here? What is the purpose of my life? What does it mean to be human? Stories bring order and meaning to the chaos and randomness of life. A story always has a beginning, middle and end, which is very satisfying to us, since we don’t know how our own personal story will end. And our lives are really a search for our own story, aren’t they?

Finally, stories connect us to one another. Even though we know they are fiction, stories elicit powerful emotional responses in us. While we are immersed in a story, we can see the world through someone else’s eyes. We can know what it’s like to be a poor boy in Delhi or a slave girl in 1700s Virginia or the Queen of England. Sharing our subjective experiences through stories enable us to connect and empathize with one another. By sharing through stories, we are better able to live together.

Because stories can elicit powerful emotional responses, they are powerful tools. They can be used to persuade people and change societies, and they have — with good and bad results. That’s why criticism of stories is essential as well. Our endless discussion of stories — on the Internet, around the water cooler, in other stories — is really an intrinsic part of the storytelling process, as essential as the stories themselves. We should always distrust those who try to suppress our stories — any of them — or our discussion of those stories.

What would happen if we encountered an alien race that did not tell stories, that didn’t even understand what stories were? Would we be able to communicate with them, or relate to them? Hmm, perhaps someone should write a story about that (if they haven’t already).

For more:
The Pleasures of Imagination (The Chronicle of Higher Education)
The Importance of Story (Heroes Not Zombies)

A wiki’s power comes from participation

It always amazes me when I visit wikis like Wikipedia or Lostpedia, and I see how a group of dedicated volunteers can collaborate to create a truly impressive body of knowledge. Now that I have been using a wiki in my own work, I have a better understanding of just what a powerful tool it is. The wiki’s utility resides in its simplicity, which enables (after learning a few basics) the technology to get out of the way of the users. And since it is built on the idea that everyone has something of value to contribute, over time the information contained on a good wiki becomes much more than the sum of its parts.

We are using a wiki for our Open Source development projects, but I don’t think we’re quite there on the collaboration aspect. Like all social media, a wiki becomes more worthwhile when more people participate meaningfully in it. But it is very difficult to communicate the value to someone who hasn’t participated in order to convince them to contribute. First, you have to do, and over time, you probably will come to know the value. This is similar to the value of micro-blogging, as I pointed out in an earlier post.

And we have to get past some barriers, especially in the work setting, before that participation becomes a natural part of the workflow. This reminds me of a recent Bamboo Project discussion on how do we know when an idea is dead. Social media has changed a lot of things, and many old ideas just don’t apply anymore. When it comes to wikis, there are two main ideas that need to be put to rest once and for all.

The first is that you have to ask permission. Maybe, depending on the openness of the wiki, you ask permission once, when you create an account. But once you have that account, you have the freedom to contribute and edit whatever you want. If there are problems, they are taken care of after they occur, rather than spending a lot of energy trying to anticipate and prevent them. But in the workplace, we tend to seek permission to do anything, so this kind of openness can just feel wrong.

The second is that someone owns their content or pages. A wiki is “owned” by the group that uses it. Yes, it’s useful to have gardeners who tend the space and keep it tidy, but they are not the same as owners. We have to give up notions of “that’s my area of expertise, this is yours, so stay out of my territory.” A few people contribute to our work wiki, but they don’t often edit one another’s pages. Instead, everyone has their own little area. I think this goes against the core idea of a wiki: that the information on the wiki grows in value as more people contribute to it and refine it. I want people to edit the pages I post on our wiki. I invite them to. But I do think there’s some hesitation to just dive in and do it.

A third “dead” idea occurs to me. We have to let go of perfection. There is a notion that something cannot appear “in print” unless it has been polished and revised and reviewed. But again, this defeats the purpose of the wiki. The wiki will never be perfect. It grows and changes organically over time, as our knowledge and needs grow and change. The wiki’s ability to do this easily, even naturally, is yet another reason why it’s such a powerful tool for collaboration and knowledge sharing. But it all starts when someone has the courage to post something, no matter how imperfect it might be.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Take a blended approach to learning

No matter what the subject, there are a thousand people who have a one-size-fits-all solution to sell you. As a new parent, I’ve been reading a lot of parenting books lately, and the sheer amount of contradictory advice can be overwhelming. But this is true is pretty much every arena where I have an interest: self improvement, getting organized, writing, even taking care of the environment. Green Daily identifies this problem in the article, “Green impotence, or the ‘every solution creates a problem’ problem.” The truth is that there is no one solution that will fit everyone’s needs. But just because you can’t find an easy, packaged solution doesn’t mean you should give up altogether. You’ll have more success by taking the time to craft a solution that fits your individual needs.

Not even the great guru of getting organized, David Allen of Getting Things Done fame, can claim to have the one solution to all of your organization woes. He has developed the perfect system to meet his specific needs, and in his book about it, he shares a lot of good ideas, some of which may work for you or me. The trick is to identify and borrow those ideas that are workable for you, and leave the rest. There’s no need to go to extremes: to either adopt the system wholesale even if it causes you pain or just abandon it altogether and declare it evil. Take what works for you, leave the rest and thank Mr. Allen for sharing.

This is the best approach to all new subjects you are learning about, whether it’s parenting or self improvement or how to manage a project effectively. Read widely and absorb what many people have to say on the subject. Try out those aspects that make sense to you and see if they work for you. If they do, adopt them. Leave the rest. Keep learning and tweaking and adapting as you go along. You are not obligated to all or nothing.

Unfortunately, this is just what proponents of a particular system would have you believe. Take attachment parenting, for instance. If you get at all involved in the community, you might think that if you don’t practice co-sleeping or baby wearing, you aren’t doing “real” attachment parenting. And probably you aren’t, not the way it is defined by its fanatical adherents. However, you can adopt only those aspects of it that make sense for you and your family, and you’ll be doing quite all right. There is no reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater, so to speak. And I don’t mean to pick on this one particular community. All “movements” seem to have their extremely rigid adherents who claim that if you don’t practice by the book, you’re not really practicing (even hula-hooping).

I propose that it is better to question, test and draw your own conclusions — in other words, think for yourself — rather than blindly follow any system set down in a book or website.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Idea incubators…

I am experimenting with using online tools as “idea incubators”–places where I can gather notes, clippings, links, etc. about an idea and flesh it out until it’s ready to turn into an actual project. I was inspired by this article posted in LifeDev. While my first experiment is for a personal, creative project, this would also be a good way for small teams to collaborate on any kind of project idea.

I think web-based tools are ideal for this sort of thing for many reasons:

  • They are computer independent so you can work on your idea from anywhere
  • They take advantage of linking to web resources to build a library of supporting materials and tools for the idea
  • They allow for organic idea building using techniques like tagging and cross references through links, which I think is ideal for the early stages of idea development
  • They usually have built-in support for collaboration and commenting
  • Many tools have options for keeping things private, sharing with a small group or publicly sharing, and for changing between these states as needs change
  • They are often free

Right now, I am playing with using WordPress to incubate and develop a creative idea. I chose WordPress because I am exceedingly familiar with it, from having used it for over a year now to blog, and because I can keep it private until I’m ready to share. I can use both tags and categories to organize my “notes” on the idea, and use the blogroll to build a library of supporting web resources. I can also take advantage of the widgets to capture information from other web tools, such as delicious or through RSS feeds.

However, WordPress may not be the ideal tool. Other tools that might also suit are personal wikis and the Google suite. Wikis are particularly attractive because they have built-in features for easy organizing and cross-referencing of a growing body of information. Now that I am using a wiki at work, I am really appreciating how versatile and powerful they are.

This is something I’m just playing around with now, so I’m open to ideas. Anyone else using web-based tools to nurture and grow their ideas? Do you have tips or suggestions to share?

How to Grow Your Ideas with a Project Incubator (LifeDev)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Turning email into actions: My Outlook system

I am getting through the a primer on the Getting Things Done system a little bit at a time. This is my method for ensuring that I thoroughly absorb the new system or methodology I am learning, adapt it to meet my needs and incorporate it into my worldview. If I tried to do this in big chunks, it would overwhelm me, so I keep chiseling away at it a little bit at a time, and the change becomes cumulative. (This is the same approach I am taking to learning Buddhism, by the way.)

The first idea I incorporated from GTD was carrying a small Moleskine notebook that I could use to immediately record actions, needs, appointments, notes and other little bits of information so they wouldn’t get lost in the morass that is my brain. (Thanks to the Creating Passionate Users blog for the idea, which I immediately adapted to my own needs.) By the way, carrying a Moleskine notebook with you everywhere you go is sure to make you feel very literary, even if all you’re recording is your need to buy flourescent lightbulbs.

My notebook represents one Action List, mostly personal actions. My goal is to check off one per day. But the bulk of my work-related to do’s are stored in my Outlook Tasks list (see my post about how I use Outlook’s Tasks list to organize all of my actions). Inspired by GTD, I have worked out a system that helps me transform my emails into my actions using Outlook.

When an email comes into my Inbox, I read the email only once and then I take one of the following 4 actions:

  1. Delete it.
  2. File it — I use Outlook’s rules as much as possible to do the filing for me.*
  3. Do it, if it will take under 2 minutes to complete.
  4. Flag it and send it to the Waiting List.

*I use one of Outlook’s Search Folders — the Unread Mail folder — to read all my emails, so even though they are pre-filed, I don’t have to dig through all the folders to find the new messages. The Unread Mail folder is like a virtual Inbox, except once you’ve read something, it disappears. Cool! (I really hope the Search Folders remain in Outlook 2007, or my whole system will be compromised.)

I use Outlook’s flags to create a Waiting List where I can park every email I get that is waiting on some kind of action. The flags are different colors, and each color has a specific meaning:

  • Red is for emails that require a high-priority action be added to my Action List.
  • Blue is for emails that require a medium-priority action be added to my Action List.
  • Yellow is for emails that require a low-priority action be added to my Action List.
  • Green is for emails that require a response from someone else before I can take an action.
  • Orange is for emails containing information that I will need for a scheduled meeting.
  • Purple is for emails containing information that I will need soon but I am not sure when.

If an action really needs to be done that day, I will skip the flagging and turn it into an action when I read the email, with a due date of today, so it will my immediately appear on my to-do list.

Another one of Outlook’s Search folders — For Follow Up — organizes all of my tagged emails into one place. I sort the flags by color, so the highest-priority (red) items are at the top of the list. Once a day, usually first thing in the morning , I go through the Waiting List and turn the red, blue and yellow items into actions on my Tasks list.

The next thing I do is open my Action List and pick the 3 Most Important Things I need to do that day. I assign them as due that day. That way, my day’s to-do list is short and sweet when I view it next to my Calendar on the Outlook Today screen. If I get through all 3 tasks and still have time, I can return to my Tasks List and work on upcoming actions in any order I like.

When I work in Outlook, I usually have the Outlook Today screen open so I can keep referring to my calendar and to-do list. (I understand that in Outlook 2007, Outlook Today will be the default screen, making things even easier.) On the left, under Favorite Folders, there are only 3 items: Inbox, Unread Mail and For Follow Up. Everything I need, available at a glance — this system keeps getting leaner and meaner the more I work on it.

Another point I am trying to make with this post is that you can make software work for your personal organizational system, whatever it is. You don’t need software specially designed to support your system. As long as I work where I do, I am going to be using Outlook, so I just made its features work for me. If you use another email or PIM program, you can probably do the same with it. It takes some time to learn the software well so you can put it to work, but it’s time well spent.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]