The gulf of toleration…

There’s altogether too much harping on respect and banning these days. If you can’t respect something, you should ban it. If it’s not banned, you should respect it. Bullshit. There is a huge gulf of toleration between respect and banning. In a free society, people should be allowed to do what they want wherever possible. The loss of liberty incurred by any alternative principle is too high a price to pay to stop people making dicks of themselves. But, if people are using their freedoms to make dicks of themselves, other people should be able to say so.

And this is what freedom is really all about.

via If Britain decides to ban the burqa I might just start wearing one | Comment is free | The Observer.
Posted in In the News | Tagged | Leave a comment

The End of Forgetting?

Reading the New York Times Sunday Magazine‘s big article today, “The Web Means the End of Forgetting,” I had several thoughts. The article, about online privacy and how old data can haunt us all our lives in a socially networked world, rehashes a familiar chestnut. In the age of Web 2.0, our privacy is greatly eroded. Our past misdeeds live on forever digitally, and we will be judged by them until the end of time, unable to get jobs or dates or a fresh start.

I had several reactions to this. The first was that this behavior is nothing new. Before the industrial age, we lived in small communities, where everyone knew everything about everybody, and made judgments — whether deserved or not — based on that knowledge. We still have those villages today; they have just changed form. The article idealizes past village life, stating that villagers were admonished to forget the sins of their neighbors, but whether this was actually done is not clear. I don’t think so, based on countless novels I have read about life in those villages. The article makes a metaphor of the scarlet letter, but wasn’t the scarlet letter intended as a way to make sure no one in the village forgot the sin of the past?

Human behavior hasn’t changed all that much, but our tools have. Our tools are not the problem, as these articles always seem to suggest. As if technology were some amorphous personality with its own desires and motives. Regardless of how many drunken photos are pasted on Facebook, it’s not Facebook that judges us, but one another. And if we didn’t have Facebook as the means to facilitate judgment, something else would take its place.

I would argue that these technologies are actually helping us, rather than setting us back. Sure, there is the obligatory anecdote of the person getting fired because of an indiscreet photo posted online. The frightening bugaboo of potential employers, scanning the web into the wee hours for our indiscretions, even our poor choices in books and movies, so they can decide not to hire us based on these things, is dutifully trotted out. At some point, such scrupulous employers will run out of candidates who meet their ridiculous standards, at which point, such standards will be relaxed. When almost everyone has a drunken picture of them somewhere on the web, it will cease to be scandalous. And I think that day is approaching more quickly due to all our openness.

Our social technologies have moved gossip and judgment out of the dark corners of the village and out into the bright light of day. I don’t think the solution is to find better ways to erase or hide our digital pasts. On the contrary, more openness about who we are and what we do, I think leads to better understanding of one another, and more acceptance and more tolerance. When something is hidden and secret, it becomes titillating and scandalous. When something is out in the open, it becomes commonplace. Perhaps not forgetting, rather than forgetting, is a better way to move toward a more tolerant world.

The Web Means the End of Forgetting (New York Times)
Posted in The Times | Tagged | 3 Comments

Today I am reading… Eternal Fascism

Eternal Fascism: 14 Ways of Looking at a Blackshirt: A prescient essay by Umberto Eco, published in 1995, but with much relevance to today’s political climate.

Posted in What I'm Reading | Tagged | Leave a comment

Racism, Shirley Sherrod and the 24-hour news cycle…

I’m so angry about the Shirley Sherrod story that I don’t think I can coherently write about it. I think this story has displayed the worst of everyone involved: Brietbart and Fox News for sacrificing an innocent African-American woman working at a low level of the federal government in hopes of scoring a cheap shot against the administration; the Obama administration for rushing to fire her without taking 30 seconds to determine the facts; and the NAACP for their knee-jerk condemnation when they should be defending her. My reluctant kudos go to the media, who for once investigated a spurious claim from Fox News (at least by this morning) and reported the truth. Barack Obama owes Ms. Sherrod a public apology, in person.

Shirley Sherrod and the Spooners, the farmers she helped who are now defending her, should be held up as examples of the kind of people we should all be emulating: people who overcame the hardships in their lives to better themselves and who judge people not by the color of their skin, but the content of their character.

My husband also wrote eloquently about this. Here are his words:

Racism is more than just insulting another person or making them drink from a separate water fountain. The Tea Party has a sizable racist element that attacks the President using racial imagery, slurs, and racist cultural references meant to demean him and an entire ethnicity. The Tea Party movement also refuses to distance themselves from what they consider a fringe element. This attack on Ms. Sherrod, claiming she is a racist when in fact she was telling a story of overcoming a racial bias, is patently racism. It’s calling out an individual based on the color of their skin and totally warping their words to accuse her of something she did not do.

via Can We Kill the 24 Hour News Cycle? – The Molloy-verse

Read more:Lying About Lying: Andrew Breitbart Says His Fraudulent Attack Video Was “Misconstrued” as an Attack (Slate)
When race-baiting backfires: The Shirley Sherrod teachable moment (The Grio)
The Twisted Politics of White Victimology: In Defense of Shirley Sherrod (Alternet)
Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Thoughts on free will & fatalism…

It’s a question we’ve asked ourselves for millennia: Do we make our own choices, or are we controlled by outside forces, such as the gods or — as science has ascended and we’ve learned more about these things — our genes, our subconscious and/or our animal instincts for survival and reproduction?

When I read an article like this or a blog like this, I tend to think it’s the latter. Despite inventing high-fructose corn syrup, we eat as if food were still scarce, and we all get fat. We hire people based on their beauty, which can be defined as traits we want passed on to the seceding generations. We find it difficult to comprehend long-term problems like global warming and can’t sacrifice our short-term rewards to solve them.

When we start believing that our instincts or our subconscious behaviors determine every choice we make, fatalism could set in. Someone who accepts such fatalism could logically conclude that he is not responsible for his actions and behave unethically or even break the law. And why not? If my subconscious or my genes determine my behavior, then what’s the point of doing anything?

I believe that the great story of being human is the struggle to operate as if we in fact do shape our own lives, even if that’s not strictly true. Identifying a purpose in life and believing we have the free will to pursue that purpose are what make consciousness bearable. It’s no accident that our most enduring stories are about people who struggled for freedom and sacrificed their own needs or desires to achieve a greater good.

Even if the concept of free will is just an invention to help us cope with our consciousness of our finite lives, it is a useful one. We should behave as if we have free will, even if that behavior is coded into our genes. That is the only way we can advance as a species, a goal that may provide that much-needed purpose to life.

Read more:
The Beauty Advantage (Newsweek)
Think You’re Operating on Free Will? Think Again (Time)
You Are Not So Smart
Naturalism.org
Posted in Of General Interest | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Today I am reading… Obsolete

Posted in What I'm Reading | Tagged | Leave a comment

Blog ’til you drop…

Reading today how writing for content-heavy blogs like Politico and Gawker is like bootcamp. The content at such blogs (which I do read on occasion) shows the lack of time and care:

Such is the state of the media business these days: frantic and fatigued. Young journalists who once dreamed of trotting the globe in pursuit of a story are instead shackled to their computers, where they try to eke out a fresh thought or be first to report even the smallest nugget of news — anything that will impress Google algorithms and draw readers their way.

Unfortunately, the original New York Times article is behind their registration wall, so I will have to try to find it in the paper paper.

Meanwhile, Cory Doctorow says that reports of blogging’s demise have been largely exaggerated. Media changes and expands, but actual deaths are rarer than we tend to think, or to blog about.

Gravitas at High Metabolism Blogs: ‘It Was Like Bootcamp, the Politico’ (New York Observer)
Reports of blogging’s death have been greatly exaggerated (Guardian)
Posted in In the News | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Taking Web Humor Seriously, Sort Of

When Funny Goes Viral: Today the New York Times Sunday Magazine looks at the Internet meme as an expression of our collaborative consciousness. You know, memes like sad Keanu Reeves and LOLCats. While acknowledging that such memes can be stupid or lowbrow, the article also suggests that they’re an important means of group expression — but I wish it had taken this analysis a bit farther.

Mentioned: Know Your Meme, which attempts to document all Internet memes as they arise.

Posted in The Times | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Today I’m reading… Pandas and Lobsters

Pandas and Lobsters: Why Google Cannot Build Social Applications… – An interesting analysis of what Google does and what successful social applications like Facebook and Twitter do, and why Google hasn’t been good at social thus far.

Posted in What I'm Reading | Tagged | Leave a comment

Because it’s Friday…

Here is the Swedish chef. Make popcorn and enjoy.

Posted in Vidlets | Tagged | 1 Comment